When Words Turn to Weapons: Navigating Political Violence in a Divided America

The recent assassination of MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk and the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump have plunged the United States into a "profound shock bordering on despair". These incidents provoke urgent questions regarding the trajectory of American political discourse and the escalating prevalence of violence. While the current spike in political violence may appear unprecedented, a comprehensive examination reveals that such acts are deeply interwoven into the nation's historical fabric, driven by a complex interplay of ideological, psychological, and societal factors that fundamentally threaten democratic stability. This analysis will explore historical patterns, dissect contemporary drivers, examine the profound, often unseen, human costs, and propose pathways toward de-escalation and societal resilience.

The Alarming Rise: A Modern Crisis with Deep Roots

Current "Unprecedented Spike" and Shifting Dynamics

The 2020s have witnessed an "unprecedented spike in political violence," which experts attribute to an "extremely polarized environment and societal transitions". This period is frequently paralleled with historical peaks of national turmoil, such as the late 1960s, an era similarly characterized by profound social and political upheavals. A notable shift like this, in violence, is the rise of "ungrouping" or self-radicalization online, where individuals operate outside formal organizational structures. This trend suggests that the primary threat in contemporary U.S. political violence emanates from "lone extremists," rather than organized militias. This phenomenon is closely related to stochastic terrorism, a concept describing public incitement that leads to unpredictable, individual acts of violence.

A Troubling Timeline of Recent Incidents

The recent past offers a grim illustration of this escalating trend:

• 2017: Shooting at Charity Baseball Game Congressman Steve Scalise, an ardent Trump supporter, was among five individuals wounded when a gunman opened fire on Republican lawmakers practicing for a charity baseball game. The assailant, James T. Hodgkinson, had expressed anti-Republican sentiments.

• 2018: Pipe Bombs Mailed to Democrats. Cesar Sayoc, a self-identified extremist Trump supporter, mailed 16 improvised explosive devices to prominent critics of President Trump, including Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Though no bombs detonated, Sayoc intended to assassinate liberal leaders.

• 2020: Plot to Kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer. Members of right-wing militia groups, angered by COVID-19 public health measures and anti-government ideology, plotted to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer. The plot was foiled by the FBI.

• 2021: Storming of the U.S. Capitol On January 6, a violent mob of pro-Trump extremists, fueled by false claims of a stolen election, stormed the U.S. Capitol. This event, resulting in multiple deaths and numerous injuries, is widely considered "perhaps the most high-profile episode of political violence in the US this century" and an "unprecedented assault on Congress".

• 2022: Attempted Assassination of Justice Brett Kavanaugh Nicholas John Roske, armed with a gun and knife, attempted to assassinate conservative Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, motivated by his opposition to the potential overturning of Roe v. Wade.

• 2022: Attack on Paul Pelosi. David DePape, a believer in far-right conspiracy theories, broke into Speaker Nancy Pelosi's home, assaulting her husband with a hammer. DePape stated his intent to kidnap and harm the Speaker.

• 2024: Donald Trump Shot at Campaign Rally During a campaign event, former President Donald Trump survived an assassination attempt when Thomas Matthew Crooks fired an AR-style rifle from a rooftop, grazing Trump's ear. This was described as "the most serious presidential-level attack since 1981".

• 2025: Assassinations of Minnesota Politicians. Minnesota state representative Melissa Hortman and her husband were shot dead, and State Senator John Hoffman and his wife were wounded, in what authorities labeled a "politically-motivated assassination" by an anti-government extremist with a hit list of Democratic lawmakers.

• 2025: Killing of Charlie Kirk, MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk was fatally shot on a university campus. This event further underscored the cycle of violence in U.S. politics and ignited widespread shock.

  
  

A Recurring American Phenomenon

Phenomenons

It is crucial to recognize that political violence in the U.S. is "not a new phenomenon but has a long history". The nation has endured the assassinations of four sitting presidents:

Abraham Lincoln (1865), James A. Garfield (1881), William McKinley (1901), and John F. Kennedy (1963), each of which fundamentally altered the political landscape and led to significant reforms. Historically, political violence tends to spike during periods of intense social or political change, particularly when the nation’s "political center is weakened" and society finds itself at a "tipping point". These moments, such as the post-Civil War era or the turbulent 1960s, foster both eagerness for change and a fierce desire to defend the status quo, creating fertile ground for extremist acts.

Decoding the Drivers: Why America is at a Tipping Point

Deep Political Polarization and Identity Politics

A consistently cited driver of political violence is the profoundly "divided" and perhaps "irrevocably" polarized state of American society. This intense partisan division is often exacerbated by identity politics, where political affiliation becomes intertwined with deeply held racial, ethnic, religious, and gender identities. This consolidation fosters clearer in-group/out-group dynamics, leading to a "sense of tribal, existential threat". Such conditions can lead to the dehumanization of political opponents, where rivals are perceived as "mortal enemies" or "downright evil," thereby "lowering inhibitions against violence". While both Democrats and Republicans have expressed some levels of support for violence in abstract polling, actual incidents of political violence have been "vastly more prevalent on the right" in recent decades, though rising on both sides.

The Potent Brew of Conspiracy Theories and Disinformation

The pervasive spread of conspiracy theories and disinformation is a significant accelerant of political violence. Narratives such as "stolen election" claims, "deep state" plots, or QAnon theories inflame a sense of existential threat and perceived victimhood, potentially motivating individuals to violent action. The 2024 Trump assassination attempt serves as a compelling case study, demonstrating the rapid emergence of diverse conspiratorial narratives across the political spectrum immediately following a high-profile event. Notably, research indicates that while social media is a primary source of exposure to these theories, "information received through interpersonal social networks was more closely linked to belief" in both left- and right-leaning conspiratorial narratives. This underscores that conspiracy beliefs are fundamentally a "social phenomenon".

The Complex Psychology of Perpetrators: A "Pathway to Violence"

A singular motive rarely drives political assassins; rather, their actions emerge from a "complex interplay of personal and ideological factors". Assassination is typically the culmination of an "identifiable behavioral process," not a spontaneous act.

Pathway to Violence

Key Motivations:

• Ideological Extremism: Many perpetrators are driven by fervent political or extremist ideologies, including anti-government sentiments, white supremacy, anti-abortion stances, or anti-Trump views.

• Personal Grievances and Fame-Seeking: Assassins often harbor a "deep-seated feeling of being wronged or insignificant". A powerful driver is a "quest for significance," a desire to gain meaning or respect when feeling humiliated. Committing a dramatic, violent act is seen as a rapid route to becoming "significant" and achieving notoriety.

• Mental Health Issues: A "significant proportion" of assassins have documented histories of serious mental health issues, with 44% experiencing depression and 43% delusional beliefs in one study. While few are legally "insane," conditions like paranoia, schizophrenia, or severe depression are often part of their psychological makeup, even if they are functional enough to plan an attack. This often manifests as an "injustice collector" syndrome, where individuals accumulate grievances and externalize blame onto public figures.

  
  

Critical Warning Signs ("Leakage"): Assassins rarely issue direct threats to their targets. However, approximately two-thirds "communicate their intent in some form to third parties or in personal writings" (e.g., diaries, manifestos, comments to friends/family) before the act. This "leakage" is a critical warning sign. Perpetrators also often engage in preparatory behaviors such as researching and stalking targets, practicing with weapons, or scouting security arrangements.

The Incendiary Power of Political Rhetoric and Leadership

Inflammatory political rhetoric and the actions of leaders are crucial factors that can either incite or de-escalate violence. When leaders demonize their opponents, it can provide implicit justification for followers to resort to violence, effectively giving them "the match to light the tinder." Research demonstrates that speeches expressing "anger, contempt, and disgust (ANCODI)" towards political outgroups are significantly correlated with subsequent violent events. Such rhetoric "lowers the barriers to assassination" by offering a moral license for lethal action.

The Pervasive Threat of Firearms

The widespread availability of firearms, notably high-powered weapons like AR-15 style rifles, significantly contributes to the lethality of political attacks. As a fundamental principle, "more guns mean more gun violence," directly increasing both the probability and deadliness of such incidents. The AR-15, for instance, has become a symbolic weapon in America's polarization, utilized in multiple political attacks.

The Unseen Costs: Beyond the Headlines

The Human Toll on Living Public Servants and Their Families

While high-profile assassinations and attempts capture national attention, the daily "cost of public service" for living officials and their families remains underrepresented. There has been a "significant increase in the number of threats against public officials and candidates at all levels". Lower-level officials, such as election administrators, local lawmakers, and judges, are particularly vulnerable due to their often minimal security, making them "soft targets." This environment imposes a severe psychological and emotional burden on these individuals, potentially deterring qualified candidates from pursuing or remaining in public service, thus impacting the quality and diversity of governance.

Erosion of Democratic Norms and Public Debate

Rising political violence is inherently "unhealthy for democracy" and functions as both a "symptom and cause of democratic erosion itself". The targeting of public figures and institutions "silences speech" and undermines "the sanctity of its public debate," as tragically highlighted by the shooting of Charlie Kirk on a university campus, a place traditionally dedicated to open expression. The normalization of violence as a means to achieve political objectives fundamentally erodes the principles of peaceful power transfer and civil discourse, threatening the core tenets of democratic governance.

Navigating the Path Forward: Strategies for De-escalation and Resilience

Leadership's Imperative: "Turning the Temperature Down"

Political leaders bear a critical responsibility to mitigate violence. They must "turn the temperature down" on the temperature of political discourse and "vocally speak out against violence," consciously avoiding expressions of "anger, contempt, and disgust" toward their political opponents. Research indicates that leaders' rhetoric is particularly potent in de-escalating violence when they are "willing to speak against their own side".

Combating Disinformation and Online Radicalization

Addressing the spread of disinformation and the mechanisms of online radicalization is paramount. Strategies include implementing "third-party fact checkers" for social media platforms and integrating "media literacy training" into educational curricula to enhance critical consumption of information. Furthermore, a promising approach is "inoculation," proactively warning individuals that they may be exposed to and manipulated by extremist propaganda, thereby building "mental defenses". Given that a "significant portion of those engaged in far-right violence are also under mental distress," targeted advertisements and programs (such as Moonshot CVE) can effectively redirect individuals searching for extremist content towards mental health hotlines or resources for leaving violent groups.

Strengthening Institutions and Security

Historical assassinations have consistently spurred significant advancements in protection measures, such as the creation of the modern Secret Service after McKinley died in 1901 and the expansion of protection for presidential candidates after Robert F. Kennedy's assassination in 1968. These protective measures must be continually adapted and extended to safeguard increasingly vulnerable state and local officials. Ensuring "swift justice for violence, incitement, and credible threats against officials," including "speedy jail sentences, for instance, even if short," is crucial for its deterrent value. Police forces should receive enhanced training in de-escalation techniques and improve intelligence sharing regarding domestic threats. Additionally, reforms to bolster election credibility, such as those proposed in the Freedom to Vote Act (e.g., enhancing cybersecurity, protecting election officers, and providing paper trails), are essential to "shore up a problematic system" and restore public trust.

Fostering Civil Discourse and Connection

At the individual and community levels, fostering civil discourse is vital. Cultivating "intellectual humility," the awareness of one's own fallibility, is a critical first step, urging individuals to "verify facts before you share them, especially when those facts seem to confirm your worldview". It is imperative to consciously reject dehumanizing language and avoid expressing "anger, contempt, and disgust" towards opposing groups, as this demonstrably "lowers the barriers to assassination". Investing in mental health care and promoting social connection can "reduce support for violence," as isolation and depression are correlated with increased vulnerability to extremist appeals. Moreover, understanding the phenomenon of "moral convergence," where violence becomes more likely when individuals perceive that their moralized attitudes are widely shared, is key to recognizing and mitigating collective radicalization.

Addressing Systemic Vulnerabilities

Beyond immediate actions, systemic vulnerabilities require attention. Winner-take-all electoral systems and two-party dynamics can exacerbate "us-them" dynamics, deepening polarization and increasing the risk of violence. The politicization of law enforcement and the courts, alongside recent legal decisions that enhance the electoral power of state legislatures, further weaken institutional guardrails against political violence.

Conclusion: Choosing Ballots Over Bullets

Debate Not Violence

The current surge in political violence reflects a perilous period in American history, characterized by deep polarization, the rapid spread of disinformation, and a complex interplay of psychological vulnerabilities. While history offers a sobering account of past turmoil, it also suggests that "when the political temperature eventually lowers...the frequency of attacks may decline". Reversing the current trajectory demands a "concerted effort" from leaders, institutions, and individuals alike. The imperative is clear: society must commit to fostering "respectful and sober" conversations and debates, ensuring that political change is pursued "with ballots and debate, not bullets and blood". This collective commitment is essential to safeguard the public sphere from the trauma of political violence and uphold the foundational principles of American democracy.

References:

A Century of Political Assassinations and Attempts (1925–2025). (2025).

CBC News. (2024, July 15). America's history of assassinations and political violence. CBC Radio.

Committee on Homeland Security, Ranking Member Bennie G. Thompson. (n.d.). H.R. 8081: the DISGRACED Former Protectees Act – or the Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable Former Protectees Act Fact Sheet.

Drummond, M. (2025, September 11). 'Unique American phenomena' - The string of bloody political violence in the MAGA era. Sky News.

Kayata, E. (2024, July 18). Trump assassination attempt is another example of political violence happening when the nation is ‘on the cusp’ of change, experts say. Northeastern University.

Kleinfeld, R. (2021, October). The rise of political violence in the United States. Journal of Democracy, 32(4), 160–176.

Konkel, L. (2025, May 28). How presidential assassinations changed U.S. politics. History.com. Retrieved from https://www.history.com/articles/how-presidential-assassinations-changed-u-s-politics

Ognyanova, K., Druckman, J. N., Schulman, J., Baum, M. A., Perlis, R. H., & Lazer, D. (2025, June 14). Information from social ties predicts conspiracy beliefs: Evidence from the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. PNAS Nexus, 4(6), pgaf193. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf193

Pilkington, E. (2025, September 11). ‘What have we become?’: shock across US political parties after Charlie Kirk shooting. The Guardian.

Psychological Perspectives on Political Assassinations in the United States. (2025).

Smith, J. A., & Jilani, Z. (2024, July 18). What’s driving political violence in America? Greater Good Science Center.

Tomes, N. (n.d.). HISTORY 401.01 Presidential Assassinations in Historical Perspective. Stony Brook University.